Last updated:
4:10 PM, 28 July 2014



Jim Miller on Politics

  Email:
jimxc1 at gmail.com



What's he reading? Francis Parkman.

News Compilers
(Why These?)

A&L Daily
Drudge
egopnews.com
*The Grid
Hot Air
Jewish World Review
Lexis-Nexis
Lucianne
Mediaite
memeorandum
Monsters and Critics
*newser
Orbusmax
Rantburg
Real Clear Politics
SciTech Daily
Yahoo


Big Media
(Why These?)

Atlantic Monthly
BBC
CNN
Chosen Ilbo
*Daily Mail (UK)
*Deutsche Welle
Fox News
Globe and Mail (CA)
Guardian (UK)
Investor's Business Daily
Le Figaro (FR)
Le Monde (FR)
The Local (Sweden)
National Review
New Republic
New York Times
The New Yorker
Politico
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
Slate
Slashdot
The Spectator (UK)
Der Spiegel
Telegraph (UK)
Times (UK)
El Universal
U. S. News
USA Today
Wall Street Journal
Washington Examiner
Washington Post
Washington Times


References:

Adherents
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Census Quick Facts
Dave Leip's Election Atlas
FactCheck
Federal Statistics
How Stuff Works
NationMaster
Refdesk
Snopes
StateMaster
Tax Facts
Unionstats
Wikipedia


Smart Media
(Why These?)

ABC News Note
*The American
The American Spectator
Michael Barone
City Journal
Commentary
Front Page Magazine
Michael Fumento
The Hill
Charles Krauthammer
Media Research
Michael Medved
New York Sun
Number Watch
PJ Media
Public Interest
Roll Call
Spinsanity
Townhall
The Weekly Standard


Blogs
(Why These?)

My Group Blog:
Sound Politics

Northwest:


The American Empire
AndrewsDad
Chief Brief
Clear Fog Blog
Coffeemonkey's weblog
Croker Sack
"DANEgerus"
Economic Freedom
Federal Way Conservative
Freedom Foundation
Hairy Thoughts
Huckleberry Online
Andy MacDonald
NW Republican
Orcinus
Public Interest Transportation Forum
<pudge/*>
Northwest Progressive Institute
*Progressive Majority
Matt Rosenberg
Seattle Blogger
Seattle Bubble
Washington Policy Center
West Sound Politics
Zero Base Thinking


Other US:


Ace of Spades HQ
Alien Corn
Ann Althouse
American Thinker
The Anchoress
Armies of Liberation
Art Contrarian
"Baldilocks"
Balloon Juice
Baseball Crank
La Shawn Barber
Beldar
Bleat
Big Government
Bookworm Room
Broadband Politics
Stuart Buck
Keith Burgess-Jackson
*Bush Center
Chef Mojo
Chicago Boyz
Classical Values
*College Insurrection
Confederate Yankee
Jules Crittenden
Daily Pundit
Discriminations
Gregory Djerejian
Daniel W. Drezner
Econlog
Econopundit
Election Law
John Ellis
Engage
Dean Esmay
Gary Farber
Fausta
FiveThirtyEight
Flares into Darkness
Flopping Aces
The Long War Journal
Gateway Pundit
Grasping Reality With Both Hands
Keith Hennessey
Hugh Hewitt
Siflay Hraka
Instapundit
Iowahawk
Joanne Jacobs
Jeff Jarvis
The Jawa Report
Brothers Judd
JustOneMinute
Kausfiles
Kesher Talk
Le-gal In-sur-rec-tion
Little Green Footballs
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Greg Mankiw
Marginal Revolution
Mazurland
Minding the Campus
The ModerateVoice
*The Monkey Cage Mudville Gazette
"neo-neocon"
Betsy Newmark
Newsbusters
No Watermelons Allowed
Ambra Nykola
*The Optimistic Conservative
The Ornery American
OxBlog
Parapundit
"Patterico"
Daniel Pipes
Polipundit
Political Arithmetik
Political Calculations
Pollster.com
Power and Control
Power Line
Protein Wisdom
QandO
Radio Equalizer
RedState
Riehl World View
Right Wing News
Rightwing Nuthouse
Dr. Sanity
Scrappleface
Screw Loose Change
Linda Seebach
Sense of Events
Joshua Sharf
Rand Simberg
Smart Politics
The Spirit of Enterprise
Stability For Our Time
*Strange Maps
The Strata-Sphere
Andrew Sullivan
Don Surber
Sweetness & Light
Taking Hayek Seriously
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf
USS Neverdock
VDH's Private Papers
Verum Serum
Villainous Company
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Monthly
Wizbang
Dr. Weevil
Matt Welch
Winds of Change
Meryl Yourish
zombietime


Canadians:


*BlazingCatFur
Colby Cosh
Five Feet of Fury
Kate McMillan
Damian Penny
Bruce Rolston


Latin America:


Babalú
Caracas Chronicles
The Devil's Excrement
Venezuela News and Views


Overseas:


"Franco Aleman"
Bruce Bawer
Biased BBC
Tim Blair
*Andrew Bolt
Peter Briffa
Brussels Journal
*Bunyipitude
Butterflies and Wheels
Crooked Timber
Davids Medienkritik
Egyptian Sand Monkey
EU Referendum
Greenie Watch
Guido Fawkes
Harry's Place
Mick Hartley
Oliver Kamm
JG, Caesarea
*Le Monde Watch
¡No-Pasarán!
Fredrik Norman
Melanie Phillips
John Ray
samizdata
Shark Blog
Natalie Solent
Somtow's World
Bjørn Stærk
Laban Tall
*David Thompson
Michael Yon
This is Zimbabwe

Science Blogs:
The Blackboard
Cliff Mass Weather
Climate Audit
Climate Depot
Climate Science
*Judith Curry
Future Pundit
Gene Expression
The Loom
In The Pipeline
Roger Pielke Jr.
Real Climate
A Voyage To Arcturus
Watts Up With That?

Media Blogs:
Andrew Malcolm
Dori Monson
David Postman
Rhetorical Ammo
Tierney Lab
*White House Dossier

R-Rated:
Horse's A**
Huffington Post

*new



Pseudo-Random Thoughts


The Latest Senate Forecast from John Sides and company.
Thus, although current polls adjust our model’s forecast for individual races, the polls do not change our topline prediction, which is currently bullish for the GOP.

Why so bullish? Here’s an explanation in a nutshell.  Most analysts give the GOP a very good shot at controlling at least 46 seats.  See the list over at The Upshot.  Control of the Senate depends on nine apparently competitive seats: Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, and Michigan.  The GOP needs to win at least five of those seats to control a majority (since the Democrats would presumably control the Senate with 50 seats, given Vice President Biden’s tie-breaking vote).

At the moment, our model suggests that the GOP has a very good chance of winning the Republican-leaning states: Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, and Louisiana.  That gives them five seats.  They also have a better than 50-50 chance of winning Iowa, where Joni Ernst’s recent surge has made the race neck-and-neck —a trend that is consistent with what our model suggested about the Iowa race back in May. Meanwhile, Democrats have a good chance of winning Colorado, Michigan, and North Carolina.
Adding it all together, the model gives Republicans an 86 percent chance of winning control of the Senate.

They are also predicting that Republicans will gain in the House races:
The updated forecast for the House is nothing surprising.  In line with what we’ve previously written, we estimate that the Democrats have less than a 1 percent chance of taking the House.   Our model currently estimates that the Democrats will win 193 seats, down slightly from the 201 they controlled after the 2012 election and the 199 they currently control, given existing vacancies.  We expect to update this forecast with additional data about the candidates once the primaries are over, and with polling data as well.  But, given how strong the Republicans’ position is, we would be surprised if any new information significantly altered the strong odds of continued Republican control.
(In the 2010 House election the Democrats won 193 seats, so Sides and company are predicting that this election will wipe out their 2012 gains.)

The general description Sides has given of the model is essentially the same as the model I would construct, were I in that business, combining as it does voting history, the current Obama unpopularity, and polls.  But I haven't looked at the details of the model, and so that is all I can say, for now.

The usual it's-early caveat applies, as Sides says, at the end of the post.

(Sides doesn't mention one interesting possibility, which could affect control of the Senate.   As I have mentioned before, Maine independent Angus King has said, more than once, that he might switch sides from the Democrats to the Republicans.  I would guess that King is hoping that Republicans win five seats, net, which would make him extremely popular with his colleagues, for a while.  And then extremely unpopular with half of them.)
- 4:10 PM, 28 July 2014   [link]


One Reason India Has So Many Poor People:  And here I am sorry, but I have to be blunt, on a subject that some will find distasteful.  That reason is widespread open defecation, which causes many diseases and even malnutrition in small children.  The New York Times article begins with the example of a one year old child, who has all the symptoms of malnutrition, in spite of getting more than enough food.
Like almost everyone else in their village, Vivek and his family have no toilet, and the district where they live has the highest concentration of people who defecate outdoors.  As a result, children are exposed to a bacterial brew that often sickens them, leaving them unable to attain a healthy body weight no matter how much food they eat.

“These children’s bodies divert energy and nutrients away from growth and brain development to prioritize infection-fighting survival,” said Jean Humphrey, a professor of human nutrition at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.  “When this happens during the first two years of life, children become stunted.  What’s particularly disturbing is that the lost height and intelligence are permanent.”
(Emphasis added.)

There's much more in the article, which I found persuasive, although this finding is new enough so that one would like to see the question tackled by other scholars.

The good news is that there are inexpensive solutions to this problem.  We know that because some have already found them.
In a little-discussed but surprising finding, Muslim children in India are 17 percent more likely to survive infancy than Hindus, even though Muslims are generally poorer and less educated.  This enormous difference in infant mortality is explained by the fact that Muslims are far more likely to use latrines and live next to others also using latrines, a recent analysis found.

So widespread housing discrimination that confines many Muslims to separate slums may protect their children from increased exposure to the higher levels of waste in Hindu communities and, as a result, save thousands of Indian Muslim babies from death each year.
It occurs to me that the new leader of India, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, may be a good person to inspire changes in these dangerous practices — because he is a devout Hindu.

(As some of you have already guessed, this is what I was hinting at yesterday.  Treating malnutrition world wide may require more toilets, as well as nutritional supplements.)
- 1:40 PM, 28 July 2014   [link]


India's New Poverty formula.
June's report, which the Indian government commissioned but hasn't formally endorsed, includes two major changes to the official methodology.  Using updated medical research, it sets minimum requirements for protein and fat in people's diets in addition to a baseline for mere calories.

In addition to the cost of food, the new formula adds the median monthly expenditure, in a government survey of 100,000 households, on four "essential" goods: education, clothing, shelter and transportation. An additional amount, for all other spending, is tacked on.

The result: You're poor in India if you earn less than 972 rupees a month in rural areas or 1,407 rupees a month in cities.  At market exchange rates, that is about $16 and $23, respectively.  The current thresholds are $14 and $17.
By way of comparison, the World Bank's threshold is currently $1.25 a day — and about 1.2 billion people, world wide, are below that threshold.

There's much more in the article, including a graph showing the enormous progress since 1990 in reducing poverty in the poorer regions of the world.
- 1:09 PM, 28 July 2014   [link]


One Year to Pluto.
There has been some fanfare this week over the 45th anniversary of Apollo 11.  If the celebration has made you despair at the listless state of today’s space program, you may be comforted by another astronomical date, a sort of pre-anniversary: One year from now, for the first time in human history, a probe will reach Pluto.  The probe is a compact-car-sized NASA spaceship called New Horizons.  It left Earth in 2006.  Pluto’s a long way away.

Pluto used to be our smallest, remotest planet, the ninth planet from the sun.  In 2006, the International Astronomical Union redesignated Pluto as a “dwarf planet.”  Despite the indignation of everyone who grew up with a now-obsolete solar-system mnemonic, the demotion was not without justice.  According to the IAU, a planet ought to “clear its neighborhood” — that is, it should be the dominant massive object in its orbit.  In fact, Pluto is less than a tenth of the total mass following its path around the sun.  Earth, for reference, is very nearly 100 percent of the mass in our orbit.  Pluto is smaller than Earth’s moon.  It’s smaller than Saturn’s largest moon, and Neptune’s, and all four of Jupiter’s major, “Galilean” moons.
Here's the Wikipedia article on the New Horizons probe, which left Earth on 19 January 2006, has already passed asteroid 13254 APL and Jupiter, where the controllers tested some of the instruments.

(If you haven't read the peculiar story of Pluto's discovery, you can at the Wikipedia article on the planet.  The article also has a reasonably clear explanation of why Pluto and Neptune will not collide any time soon, even though their orbits appear to intersect.)
- 12:47 PM, 28 July 2014   [link]


Here's A Mining Executive who understands boys.  (Even boys who are long past the age of majority, 18 in Australia, 21 in the United States.)
- 8:01 AM, 28 July 2014   [link]


53-44 And 42-55:  Those were the most interesting numbers in a recent CNN/ORC poll.  The first is the score in a hypothetical Romney-Obama contest; the second is the score in a hypothetical Romney-Clinton contest.

That's right; voters now think they made a mistake in 2012, but the same voters would repeat their mistake if they were choosing between Mitt Romney and Hillary Clinton.

Noah Rothman has much to say about the first result, but mentions the second only in passing.

But I think that any Republican strategist would reverse that emphasis.  What that second result tells me is that Republicans are still losing the war of ideas, as they have been for most of the last decade.  Swing voters have given up on Obama as a leader, but they have not rejected his ideology.  And that, considering all the failures we've seen, is discouraging.
- 6:42 AM, 28 July 2014   [link]


Does Governor Inslee Care About Starving Children In Asia?   First, some background so that you can understand why I ask that question.  There has been a long dispute between the International Longshore and Warehouse Union and a grain exporter, United Grain, which has a facility at the mouth of the Columbia River.

Last year, the National Labor Relations Board found that both sides were at fault:

NLRB regional director Ronald Hooks in Seattle says United Grain should have provided the union with a “timely, clear and complete offer” of what it needed to do to avoid to a lockout.

United Grain disputes the finding. An administrative law judge will hear the matter June 30.

Separately, Hooks said the longshoremen violated labor law by engaging in threats and violence early in the lockout.  For example, he said, picketers threw rocks at a security officer and threatened to rape a manager’s daughter.

I don't know about you, but to me violence, and threats of violence, seem worse than not making a clear offer.

United Grain continued operating, and the picketing continued.  As did threats of violence against anyone crossing the picket line, including state grain inspectors.   For a time, Washington state Governor Jay Inslee provided state patrol officers to protect those inspectors, but he has now withdrawn them.

With the expected result:

To assuage the fears of state inspectors from the Washington State Department of Agriculture, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee directed state troopers to provide an escort past the longshoremen’s picket lines in October 2013.

“They were being harassed. A lot of verbal abuse, obscenities and remarks our staff took as threats,” said Hector Castro, spokesman for the WSDA.

Citing a lack of progress in labor talks between ILWU and several Northwest grain handlers, Inslee discontinued those escorts, which caused state inspectors to stop entering the United Grain facility on July 7.

(WSDA = Washington State Department of Agriculture.)

If the grain isn't inspected, it can't be exported.

Let's summarize:  On the left side, we have Governor Inslee and the ILWU.   On the right side, we have United Grain, farmers and farm workers, all the people who move that grain from the farms to the markets, the state inspectors, and those starving children in Asia.  (All right, technically, not all of the food will go to children, and not all of the children are currently starving, though some of them are certainly very hungry.)  I know which side I'm on.

We can't say, from this evidence, that Governor Inslee doesn't care about those children (and all the others on the right side of that dispute), but we can say that he cares more about the ILWU than the children and the rest.  And we can say that he isn't put off by the ILWU's tactics.

By way of Lars Larson, who has an interview with Hector Castro you can listen to.

Cross posted at Sound Politics.
- 3:56 PM, 27 July 2014   [link]


Worth Buying:  (As it almost always is.)  This weekend's Wall Street Journal.

Two pieces are of special note, Douglas Belkin's article on Mitch Daniel's efforts to reform Purdue University, and Matt Ridley's long opinion piece on how to help the world's poor.

Here are samples from the first:
Mr. Daniels suggested the rainy-day funds, which totaled "somewhere in the mid-nine figures" and were kept by a host of academic departments for operating expenses, be moved out of low-interest-bearing accounts and put to better use.

It was the first of many steps Mr. Daniels has taken as he seeks to reorganize Purdue's sometimes-antiquated systems.  A year and a half into his tenure, Mr. Daniels has frozen tuition (for the first time in 36 years), cut the cost of student food by 10% and introduced volume purchasing to take advantage of economies of scale.
. . .
Mr. Daniels cut millions from state higher education as governor, but millions more pay for the administrative salaries that have ballooned at Purdue, along with most universities around the country.  At Purdue, there are now 75% more administrators and staff on the payroll than there were 13 years ago.
It isn't entirely clear, at most universities, whether most of those extra administrators are necessary, or even useful.  (Some are there to fill out additional paperwork for the federal government.)

And from the second:
The Copenhagen Consensus Center process has won world-wide respect for its scrupulously fair methods and startling conclusions.  Its 2012 report, published in book form as "How to Spend $75 Billion to Make the World a Better Place," came to the conclusion that the top five priorities should be nutritional supplements to combat malnutrition, expanded immunization for children, and redoubled efforts against malaria, intestinal worms and tuberculosis.

Their point wasn't that these are the world's biggest problems, but that these are the problems for which each dollar spent on aid generates the most benefit.  Enabling a sick child to regain her health and contribute to the world economy is in the child's interest—and the world's.

The numbers produced by this exercise are eye-catching. Every dollar spent to alleviate malnutrition can do $59 of good; on malaria, $35; on HIV, $11.  As for fashionable goals such as programs intended to limit global warming to less than two degrees Celsius in the foreseeable future: just 2 cents of benefit for each dollar spent.
You don't have to be Warren Buffett to figure out which of those four investments is a bad idea.

Incidentally, recent research suggests that the first objective might be better combined with another objective.  Which will lead you to guess that I have another post in mind, which you may see soon.

(Fans of the Watergate scandal — and there are a few such fans left, even a few who are younger than sixty — may also want to look at two reviews, one by John Lewis Gaddis of The Nixon Tapes and another by Frank Gannon of Elizabeth Drew's Washington Journal and John Dean's The Nixon Defense.  I am less interested in this subject than I once was, partly because I share his conclusion:
Forty years on, there are many genuine mysteries still surrounding Watergate, and "The Nixon Defense," for all its density and the publisher's claim that Dean has produced an "authoritative" work, doesn't begin to answer most of them.  We still don't even know who ordered the break-in or what the burglars were looking for.
I would like to know the answers to those questions, but doubt very much that I ever will.)
- 9:34 AM, 27 July 2014   [link]


Why The "Underpants" Bomber failed:
The notorious underwear bomber's plot in 2009 to blow up a plane on Christmas Day failed because the explosives became 'degraded' after he wore the same pair of underpants for two weeks, according to a U.S. official.
We can be grateful that he didn't listen to his mother's advice about changing his underwear — assuming Nigerian mothers give the same advice as American mothers.

More seriously, it looks to me as if we got lucky — and that we shouldn't count on being lucky in the same way the next time.
- 9:21 AM, 26 July 2014   [link]


Today's New Yorker Cartoon shows a modern party invitation.
- 7:10 AM, 25 July 2014   [link]


Local Entrepreneur Harassed By Feds:  Eric Jay Smith is in trouble for a little business he had on the side.
A Bellevue anesthesiologist is taking an immediate voluntary leave of absence as federal investigators continue to build a case against him alleging he ran a large prostitution ring using young women smuggled from Thailand and housed in several of Bellevue's ritziest high rises.
The company Dr. Smith works for, Matrix Anesthesia, provides services for one of the top hospitals in this area, Overlake.

The news accounts haven't said whether these young women had skills rare in the United States, whether they were doing work American women won't do, or some combination of the two.  But I expect those in favor of greater immigration will tell us, soon.

It all seems very multicultural to me, especially since his (unnamed) "close female associate" is almost certainly a woman from Thailand.

His money laundering technique seems a bit amateurish.
Federal investigators say the doctor used BECU ATM machines at a busy downtown Bellevue intersection on Bellevue Way and 2nd Street to deposit thousands of dollars in cash from the prostitution ring and launder the money.
(BECU = Boeing Employee Credit Union.  It has been many years since you had to be a Boeing employee to belong to this credit union.)

But I will admit that I don't know how professionals launder large amounts of illegal cash.

(FWIW, this story, except for the prominence of the Dr. Smith, is similar to other stories, in recent years, about brothels in Seattle's eastside suburbs.)
- 6:37 AM, 25 July 2014   [link]


Michelle Obama Has A Better Sense Of Humor Than I would have guessed
First lady Michelle Obama on Thursday night urged Democrats to “dig deep” into their pockets and “write a big fat check” before the midterm elections, but minutes later complained of too much money in politics.
That almost has to be a joke, especially coming after another big Barack Obama fund-raising trip.  Her timing might need a little work, though.

(You don't suppose that she really didn't see the contradiction, that she didn't intend that as a joke?)
- 5:47 AM, 25 July 2014   [link]


Accused Terror Supporter Arrested in Seattle suburb.
The two U.S. women — Muna Osman Jama, 34, of Reston, and Hinda Osman Dhirane, 44, of Kent, Washington — were arrested Wednesday and have been charged with 20 counts each of providing material support to a foreign terrorist group, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia.  The U.S. designated al-Shabab as a terrorist group in 2008; in 2012, leaders of al-Shabab and al-Qaida announced they were merging.

Jama faced an initial appearance Wednesday afternoon at the federal courthouse in Alexandria, and Dhirane appeared in U.S. District Court in Seattle.  Dhirane's husband, Rashid Jama Barhadle, told Seattle's KING-TV that she has done nothing wrong.
There are some odd aspects to this story.  The amounts transferred — $100 to $1500 — are small.  If you watch the King 5 video, you'll see that she lives with her husband and six children in a large, and almost certainly expensive, house.

All five accused are women.  Most likely, given what we know about Somali society, they were acting as directed by their husbands, who in turn were following orders from clan elders, who thought that transfers coming from women would be less suspicious.  But it is possible that the women were acting on their own.

(When the United States permitted thousands of Somalis to settle here, we saved many of them from death.  Not all of them have been grateful to us, for that.)
- 2:47 PM, 24 July 2014   [link]


Senator Elizabeth Warren Is More Modest Than President Woodrow Wilson:  Wilson, as I am sure you recall, proposed Fourteen Points; Warren has proposed just eleven "commandments", as the National Journal calls them.

But perhaps we should say less immodest, rather than more modest, bearing in mind French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau's famous quip about Wilson's Fourteen Points:  "Le bon Dieu n'en avait que dix!"  (The good Lord had only ten!)

(Some critics of Warren would say she has even more to be modest about than Wilson did.

For the record:  To be precise, I should say the quip attributed to Clemenceau, and note that at least two versions have come down to us.  My Oxford Dictionary of Quotations (3rd ed.) has this version:  "Quatorze?  Le bon Dieu n'a dix."  For those who don't read French, that would change the "had" to "has".)
- 2:07 PM, 24 July 2014   [link]


Who Is Paying For Those Obama Fund-Raising Trips?  You are, mostly.

For the record:  Obama's predecessors have done the same thing, though I can't recall any of them doing it to this extent.

(One detail that has amused (and sometimes annoyed) me for years:  Air Force 1 officially costs "$228,000 to $288,000 an hour" to operate, and there are many other costs associated with these trips, so the taxpayers are probably putting more money into these trips than Obama is collecting from those wealthy donors.  Economists would see that as inefficient.)
- 7:33 AM, 24 July 2014   [link]


Meriam Ibrahim Has Left Sudan And Landed In Rome:  For her escape, we can thank Italian diplomats, of whom the most important appears to be Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs Lapo Pistelli.

She was met at the airport by the Italian Prime Minister, Matteo Renz.

In a few days, she'll be flying to the United States with her American husband and children.   Somehow, I don't expect them to be met here by President Barack Obama, or even Secretary of State John Kerry.  I do hope President Obama has at least thanked the Italians for their help in rescuing those two small American citizens, her children.
- 7:01 AM, 24 July 2014   [link]


Window Blinds In Scotland, Controlled from England.
The BBC has been condemned as “ludicrous” after it emerged that staff in Scotland have to call an office in England - for permission to open the blinds.
It isn't clear to me, from the article, why they have this arrangement, though a bureaucratic desire for central control seems most likely.  Scottish nationalists have their own explanation for this "ludicrous" arrangement, as you would expect.

(It is likely that the company controlling the blinds wants that control in order to reduce energy costs.)
- 1:44 PM, 23 July 2014   [link]


You Can Understand Why European Nations Are Reluctant To Offend Russia if you look at the picture of trade relations between Russia and five European nations — Britain, Germany, Holland, France, and Italy — accompanying this Daily Mail article.

Example:
France is determined to sell Putin the means to wreak murder and destruction in Russia’s name against innocent people.

The French only have small reliance on Russian gas, but they have an increasing dependence on Russia’s belligerent defence ministry to keep their armaments industry going.

The Kremlin has bought two Mistral-class helicopter-carrier assault ships for deployment in the Black Sea — from where they could be used for attacks on Ukraine and, indeed, on any aircraft in danger of straying into Ukrainian airspace.

The deal guarantees 1,000 French jobs over the next four years in the otherwise run-down dockyard town of St Nazaire — vital for a country whose economy is a basket-case.
(Eastern European leaders have protested this sale.  Even the Obama administration is "concerned".)

But what you may not understand from that picture is why Putin is not reluctant to offend the Europeans.  After all, Russia is even more dependent on trade with those European countries than they are on trade with Russia.

(I have seen a report that the greater efficiency of the Russian army in recent years is partly the result of training by a German company or companies.  I haven't seen enough details to say anything definitive about that.)
- 1:20 PM, 23 July 2014   [link]


The IRS Story About Lois Lerner's Hard Drive keeps changing.
Top IRS officials told congressional investigators that Lois Lerner's hard drive -- the one containing emails that could shed light on the IRS targeting scandal -- was irreparably damaged before it was destroyed completely in 2011.  But now, investigators have had a chance to talk to the technical experts inside the IRS who actually examined Lerner's computer, and the experts say the hard drive in question was actually just "scratched," and that most of the data on it was recoverable.

The IRS computer experts also told the committee that they had recommended seeking outside help in recovering the data from Lerner's computer — something IRS management declined to do.
It is hard to think of anything, other than a fire, that could happen to a hard drive in an ordinary office that would not leave most of the data on it recoverable — though possibly at considerable expense.

It is even harder to think of any legitimate reason that the top IRS officials did not tell investigators the truth about that hard drive from the beginning.
- 6:24 AM, 23 July 2014   [link]


Archives

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002, Part 1 and Part 2
November 2002, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
December 2002, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3

January 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
February 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
March 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
April 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2004, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2004, Part 1, Part 2. Part 3, and Part 4
October 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2005, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2006, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2007, Part 1 and Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2007, Part 1 Part 2, and Part 3, and Part 4
June 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2007, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2007, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2008, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4
May 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. and Part 4

January 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2010, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2010, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2012, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2012, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2012, Part 1, Part 2 Part 3, and Part 4
August 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3and Part 4
December 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2013, , Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4
March 2014, Part 1. Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4






Coming Soon
  • Plan 17 Conservatives
  • FDR and Waterboarding
  • How Long Do Wars Last?
  • Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, and Crescent Wrenches
  • De-Lawyering and Attorney General McKenna


Coming Eventually
  • JFK and Wiretaps
  • Green Republicans
  • The Rise and Fall and Rise of Black Voting
  • Abortion, Cleft Palates, and Europe
  • Kweisi Mfume's Children
  • Public Opinion During Other US Wars
  • Dual Loyalties
  • The Power Index
  • Baby Dancing
  • Jocks, but no Nerds
  • The Four Caliphs




Best Posts


Books


Strange Obama


The Unknown Bush


University Reform


Uncorrected Mistakes


Vote Fraud


The Gang of Four


Articles


Assignment Desk
(What's This?)


Columns


Common Mistakes
(What's This?)


Chomsky Cult Program


*new